An acquisition target had passed preliminary review without a mark against it. Below the surface sat a settled dispute and a regulatory flag that neither party had disclosed. We found both before the deal closed.
Our client was in the final stages of acquiring a privately held business. Standard legal and financial due diligence had returned nothing of concern. The data room was orderly, the management team credible, and the headline terms were agreed. The client nevertheless wished to commission an independent intelligence layer before signing — a decision that proved well-founded.
Working from open sources, court records, and lawful regulatory filings across the relevant jurisdictions, we built a picture that extended beyond the documents the target had chosen to share. A civil dispute settled out of view — years earlier, with a confidentiality provision in the resolution — had not featured in any warranty disclosure. More significantly, a connected entity in a second territory carried an unresolved regulatory flag: an inquiry that had been quietly suspended rather than formally closed. Neither finding was catastrophic in isolation. Together they changed the risk profile of the deal materially, and altered the story the vendor had been telling about clean corporate history.
The client's advisers were briefed with sourced documentation that could be put before the vendor. The disclosure gap was raised directly, the regulatory matter demanded warranty cover, and the buyer moved to renegotiated terms that reflected the true position. The deal completed, but on substantially different terms than those originally agreed. The cost of the intelligence work was a fraction of the concession secured.
Names, places, sums and dates are altered to protect client confidentiality. We never confirm a client or a case; this is the kind of problem we solve.
One confidential message is enough. Tell us only what you are comfortable sharing — we take it from there.
Make a confidential enquiry